Legal Opinion

United States v. Akhtar

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided December 16, 1999No. Civ.A. H-98-3882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CRONE, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. Introduction

Pending before the court is Plaintiff, United States of America’s (“United States”) Motion for Summary Judgment (# 25). The United States seeks summary judgment against Defendant Naeem Akh-tar (“Akhtar”) on its claims of violations of 21 U.S.C. § 842(a)(10), 21 C.F.R. § 1310.05(a)(1) and (b), and other applicable regulations. Having reviewed the pending motion, the submissions of the parties, the pleadings, and the applicable law, the court is of the opinion that summary judgment should be granted.

II. Factual Background

Ak…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  5. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. BeasleyDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2015
  2. United States v. Grab Bag DistributingDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API