Legal Opinion
United States v. Grab Bag Distributing
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 15, 2002No. CIVF006132OWWSMSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WANGER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The United States of America (“Plaintiff’ or the “Government”) sues defendants Grab Bag Distributing and Rodney G. Nickerson (“Defendants”) for penalties and injunctive relief under the Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 801-971 (the “Controlled Substances Act” or the “Act”). See Doc.13, Memorandum in Support, filed September 28, 2001, at p.l. Plaintiff moves for summary judgment on the issue of Defendants’ liability. See Doc.12, Motion for Summary Judgment, filed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Nissan Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Ltd v. Fritz Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Triton Energy Corp. v. Square D Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Advance Pharmaceutical, Inc., Tasrin Hossain, and Liaquat Hossain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2017