Legal Opinion

Boling v. Stewart

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 9, 2002No. 01-17054; D.C. No. CV-98-01170-PGRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

Jerry D. Boling appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Boling challenges his Arizona conviction and 60-year sentence for six counts of attempted child molestation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Reviewing de novo, Fisher v. Roe, 263 F.3d 906, 912 (9th Cir.2001), abrogated on other grounds by Mancuso v. Olivarez, 292 F.3d 939, 949 n. 4 (9th Cir.2002), we affirm.

We may grant relief only if the state court’s decision “was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined…

2Cases cited7 opinions

Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
William Harold Mancuso, Petitioner-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Ana M. Olivarez, Respondent-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
Gary Lee Fisher v. Ernest C. Roe, Warden Attorney General of the State of California, Michael Collins v. Theo White, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
Stanley Williams v. Jeanne Woodford, Warden, California State Prison, San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
Blufford Hayes, Jr. v. Jeanne WoodfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.