Legal Opinion

Blufford Hayes, Jr. v. Jeanne Woodford

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 26, 2002No. 99-99030PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge O’SCANNLAIN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge THOMAS.

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge.

In this death penalty habeas case, we must decide whether counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to present potentially mitigating evidence at the trial’s penalty phase. We also consider numerous other claims, including whether the prosecution’s failure to reveal evidence that could have been used to impeach a witness had a material effect on the jury’s verdict.

I

On the afternoon of January 1, 1980, Blufford Hayes Jr.’s sister, Barbara Lord, *1061returned to her room at the…

2Cases cited87 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Cooper v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Leavitt v. AraveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Fred Berre Douglas v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, of Rswl California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Prete v. BradburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. Douglas Ray Stankewitz v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, San Quentin State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API