Legal Opinion

Lynn v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1894No. 15341PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court,

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This is an action to recover damages for injuries received by the plaintiff while a passenger upon the road of the defendant. The injuries were of a permanent character and very serious, and the verdict of seven thousand five hundred dollars is not assailed as being excessive. The defendant appeals from the judgment and order denying a motion for a new trial.

The record discloses no exceptions taken to the introduction or exclusion of testimony. Neither are there any exceptions taken to the charge of the court. A motion for a nonsuit was made, and denied, and this appeal is now before us upon…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lane v. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  2. Graff v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Jackson v. Natchez & W. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  4. Sand Springs R. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Weisshaar v. Kimball S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API