Graff v. United R.R. of S.F.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Wm. M. Abbott, Wm. M. Cannon, and Kingsly Cannon, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
In the decision of this case in Department the judgment was reversed because of the instruction which appears in the latter part of the opinion upon the subject of the presumption arising from an injury to a passenger while on board a railroad car. In commenting upon this instruction the opinion contained the following: ‘ ‘ The rule of law is that where an injured passenger is riding in an unusual position, which position increases his danger, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur does not apply and no presumption arises that resulting injury was due to the negligence of the carrier.” The,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Seller v. Market-Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Nolan v. . Brooklyn City Newtown R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Steele v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Froeming v. Stockton Electric R. R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Wyatt v. Pacific Elec. Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hedding v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Fred Harvey Corp. v. MateasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Ginochio v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Jones v. HedgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Brizzolari v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.