Legal Opinion
Robert Beck v. City of Cleveland, Ohio
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 12, 2004No. 02-3669PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Robert Beck, President of the Cleveland Police Patrolmen’s Association, and past and present Cleveland Police Officers (the “Police Officers”), appeal the district court’s final judgment dismissing their claims for violations of Section 207(o)(5) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207(o)(5), by the defendant, City of Cleveland (“the City”). The district court granted the City’s motion for summary judgment on the Police Officers’ FLSA claims. The Police Officers’ appeal is limited to their claims about the City’s compensatory leave policy…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- City of Cleveland v. OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America v. Hillerich & Bradsby Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Bassiri v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- La Quinta Corp. v. Heartland Properties LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Alliance for Community Media v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.