Legal Opinion

Auditor General v. Konwinski

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1929No. Docket No. 115, Calendar NO. 33361PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

In this case the validity of assessments levied in 1919 for paving a street in the (then) village of Iron River is involved. The village was incorporated and acting under Act No. 3, Pub. Acts 1895 (1 Comp. Laws 1915, § 2555 et seq.). The assessment was made on the “foot-front” plan, and the provisions of section 2708 limiting assessments to 25 per cent, of the valuation were observed, resulting in the assessment against objectors’ property being considerably in excess of other property abutting on the street having the same frontage and area. The validity of such provision as applied to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. City of Detroit v. WeilMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. City of Detroit v. DalyMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Auditor General v. CalkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Cote v. Village of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dixon Road Group v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Foren v. City of Royal OakMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Davis v. City of WestlandMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Stybel Plumbing, Inc v. Oak ParkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Carmichael v. Village of Beverly HillsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API