Harris v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ARTEMIS HARRIS, Plaintiff, Case No. 18-cv-07993 v. Judge Mary M. Rowland ERNEST SPRADLEY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Artemis Harris brings this action under
42 U.S.C. § 1983
claiming Defendant Ernest Spradley violated his Fourth Amendment rights. Spradley moves for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, Defendant Spradley’s motion for summary judgment [111] is granted. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD Summary judgment is proper where “the movant shows that there is no genuine…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Prado Navarette v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.