Legal Opinion

Harris v. City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 24, 2022No. 1:18-cv-07993Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ARTEMIS HARRIS, Plaintiff, Case No. 18-cv-07993 v. Judge Mary M. Rowland ERNEST SPRADLEY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Artemis Harris brings this action under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

claiming Defendant Ernest Spradley violated his Fourth Amendment rights. Spradley moves for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, Defendant Spradley’s motion for summary judgment [111] is granted. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD Summary judgment is proper where “the movant shows that there is no genuine…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Prado Navarette v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API