Pelham v. Rawleigh Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
1. It is well-settled law that the principal debtor and a guarantor can not be sued as codefendants in the same action. Etheridge v. Rawleigh Co., 29 Ga. App. 698 (1) (116 S. E. 903), and authorities cited.
2. Under the ruling in Etheridge v. Rawleigh Co., supra, and Rawleigh Co. v. Salter, 31 Ga. App. 329, the contract in the instant case (on which the alleged sureties were sued in the same action which was brought against the principal debtor) was one of guaranty, and, the principal debtor and the guarantors having been joined as codefendants in the same suit, the trial judge erred in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Etheridge v. Rawleigh Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Rawleigh Co. v. SalterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- State v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1866
3Cited by4 opinions
- Graybar Electric Co. v. OppCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Ebner v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Atlanta Journal Co. v. GriggsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Hammond v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960