Legal Opinion

Etheridge v. Rawleigh Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 21, 1923No. 13695PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) “The contract of suretyship is that whereby one obligates himself to pay the debt of another in consideration of credit or indulgence, or other benefit given to his principal, the principal remaining bound therefor. It differs from a guaranty in this, that the consideration of the latter is a benefit flowing to the guarantor.” Civil Code (1910), § 3538. As has often been said,-it is sometimes very difficult to apply the rules of distinction in determining whether a particular contract is that of suretyship or guaranty. In differentiating a contract of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Manry v. Waxelbaum Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Sheffield v. WhitfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  3. Baggs v. FunderburkeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  4. Small Co. v. ClaxtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  5. Heard v. Tappan & MerrittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Everts v. MattesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. The Winston Corporation v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  3. McKibben v. Fourth National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  4. Arkansas Fuel Oil Co. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  5. Rawleigh Co. v. SalterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API