Hammond v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Felton, Chief Judge.
“The contract of suretyship is one whereby a pex-son obligates himself to pay the debt of another in consideration of credit or indulgence, or other benefit given to his principal, the principal rexxxaining bound therefor. It differs from a guaranty in this, that the consideration of the latter is a benefit flowing to the guarantor.” Code § 103-101. The en dorsements of Hammond quoted above prima facie import a contract of guaranty. Hammond v. Southern Cotton Oil Co., 89 Ga. App. 79 (1), supra. If the uncontradicted evidence discloses a benefit flowing to Hammond, his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pelham v. Rawleigh Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Hammond v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
3Cited by2 opinions
- Graybar Electric Co. v. OppCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Continental Rent-A-Car of Georgia, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1972