Legal Opinion
State v. Holmes
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 1912No. 9774PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Black, J., entered May 18, 1911, upon a trial of soliciting orders for the sale and delivery of liquor in a dry unit in violation of the local option law, upon a verdict directed by the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.
The defendant was convicted on an information the charging part of which reads as follows:
“On or about the 20th day of March, 1911, in the county of Snohomish, state of Washington, the said defendant, Charles L. Holmes, under the name and style and designation of ‘Seattle Supply Company’ and ‘Seattle Supply Co.,’ did unlawfully in the city of Everett, said county and state, a unit in which the sale of intoxicating liquor was then and there prohibited and unlawful, solicit the order of one W. F. Swalwell for the sale and delivery of intoxicating liquor to said W. F. Swalwell, by depositing in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Delamater v. South DakotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Rose v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- State v. J. P. Bass Publishing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1908
- R. M. Rose Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. DaleWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- State v. RingWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Golden & Co. v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Peterson v. CrockettWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- State v. KitchenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.