Legal Opinion

Rose v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 31, 1908No. 990; 991PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Indictments for misdemeanor, from Bartow superior court— Judge Fite. January 30, 1908.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

The plaintiffs in error were accused in two presentments, which are practically identical. Demurrers were filed in both cases, and the plaintiffs in error except to the judgment of the superior court overruling their demurrers. As the same points-are presented in both bills of exceptions, they will be considered together.

The defendants in the court below were accused of the violation of §428 of the Penal Code, which forbids the solicitation or taking-of orders for intoxicating liquors in any county in this State where-tile sale of such liquors is prohibited by law, high license or otherwise.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Hooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. In Re RahrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. McHorseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. In re FiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  3. State v. GrierNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1913
  4. Youmans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  5. Thayer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API