Legal Opinion

Craig v. Crossman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1920No. Docket No. 60PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Shepherd (Frank), J., presiding. Bill by L'avina B. Donaldson, substituted for Donaldson Craig, against John M. Crossman and another for the specific performance of a land contract, and for an accounting. From a decree for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

The bill of complaint herein was filed to obtain specific performance of a written agreement by the defendant Crossman to convey to Maria Macdonald three lots in Highland Park, Wayne county, known as lots 1, 2 and 3 of H. R. Blackwood’s subdivision of outlot 1 of Yeaman’s addition to Highland Park village in quarter sections 15 and 26 of the 10,000-acre tract. The defendant Campbell was made a defendant to bar claims of ownership made by him *464of the lots in question. Maria Macdonald subsequently transferred her rights to the plaintiff.

The following statement of facts is compiled from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ripley v. SeligmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Gustin v. Union School-DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Shepard v. ShepardMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Crossman v. American InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Reed v. BondMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Holt v. StoffletMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Stevens v. DebarMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Colonial Theatrical Enterprises v. SageMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Snider v. SchafferMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Roll v. MartinNebraska Supreme Court · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API