Williams v. Frank Parra Chevrolet, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JAMES, Justice.
This is a suit for malicious prosecution. At the close of Plaintiff-Appellant’s evidence, the trial court upon Defendant-Ap-pellees’ motion withdrew the case from the jury and entered judgment that Plaintiff-Appellant take nothing, from which Plaintiff appeals. We reverse and remand.
Plain tiff-Appellant Curtis Williams brought this suit against Defendants Frank Parra Chevrolet, Inc., and its agent, Joe Bates, Appellees herein, for malicious prosecution, and alternatively, for invasion of privacy. Trial was to a jury, and after Plaintiff rested, the trial court granted an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- White v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Air Conditioning Inc. v. Harrison - Wilson - PearsonTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Ramsey v. ArrottTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- JC Penney Company v. GilfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Reed v. LindleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Akin v. DahlTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc. v. Lieck, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
- Rowe v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Stewart v. Control Data Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Akin v. DahlTexas Supreme Court · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.