Martin v. Union Pacific Railroad
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.
This is an action for damages for personal injuries brought under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. Plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment in the sum of $7500 and defendant has appealed.
Defendant insists that its instruction in the nature of a demurrer to the evidence should have been given. This necessitates our stating the facts in their most favorable light to plaintiff. There was some inconsistencies in the testimony of some of plaintiff’s witnesses and defendant to a certain degree relies upon the statements of these witnesses that are most favorable to it. However, in stating…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Daneschocky v. SiebleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1917
- Bond v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1904
- Bobbitt v. United Railways Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
- Cravens v. HunterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hamilton v. RossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- DeMoss v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
- Jones v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Pyle v. McNealyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1933