Legal Opinion
Walker v. Woodward Governor Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 26, 1986No. 83 C 20084PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSZKOWSKI, District Judge.
Before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss Counts II through V of plaintiff’s amended complaint and defendant’s motion to strike reference to 42 U.S.C. § 1988. For the reasons stated herein, defendants motion is granted with respect to Counts II (Section 1985(3)), III (Section 1986), IV (Title VII) and V (Article I, Section 17 of the Illinois Constitution). Defendant’s motion to strike reference to Section 1988 is denied.
BACKGROUND
Viewing the complaint in the light most favorable to plaintiff, as this court must for purposes of the instant motion to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Great American Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. NovotnySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Nelson Radio & Supply Co., Inc. v. Motorola, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Danny Clark CROSS, Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Joseph L. Dombrowski v. Jack Dowling and Arthur Rubloff & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hawthorne Partners v. AT & T TECHNOLOGIES, INC.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Hermene Hartman v. The Board of Trustees of Community College District No. 508, Cook County, Illinois Reynaldo Glover and Nelvia BradyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Cromley v. Bd. of Educ. of LockportDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Haigh v. Matsushita Elec. Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1987
- Bismarck Hotel Co. v. SutherlandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.