Legal Opinion

Cromley v. Bd. of Educ. of Lockport

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 1, 1988No. 87 C 9767PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MORAN, District Judge.

Defendants request that this court, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, grant their motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. In such circumstances any inference drawn must be favorable to the plaintiff, United Milk Products Co. v. Michigan Avenue National Bank of Chicago, 401 F.2d 14, 17 (7th Cir.1968), and the allegations contained in the complaint are to be accepted as true. National Van Lines, Inc. v. United States, 326 F.2d 362, 372 (7th Cir.1964); 5 Wright, Miller & Cooper, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1363 at…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Marcella Ann Cromley v. Board of Education of Lockport Township High School District 205, Donald E. Weber, Richard J. DittleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. v. PetersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  3. Lefebvre Intergraphics, Inc. v. Sanden MacHine Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  4. Doe v. Bd. of Educ. of Hononegah School Dist. 207District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  5. Industrial Hard Chrome. Ltd. v. Hetran, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API