Legal Opinion

Ragley v. Northwestern National Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1929No. 21603. Department TwoPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiffs, Ragley and Neilsen, seek recovery upon a fire insurance policy issued by the defendant insurance company, insuring their dwelling house, situated in Seattle, against loss or damage by fire in an amount not exceeding one thousand dollars, for a three-year term beginning October 1, 1926; the dwelling house having been damaged by fire on May 14, 1927. Trial upon the merits in the superior court for King county, sitting with a jury, resulted in verdict and judgment awarding to the plaintiffs recovery in the sum of $466.67, as prayed for, from which the defendant has appealed to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Port Blakely Mill Co. v. Springfield Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Nebraska & Iowa Ins. v. ChristiensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Mountain Timber Co. v. Lumber InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Colker v. Connecticut Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  5. Obermeyer v. Phoenix Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Isaacson Iron Works v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Fayle v. Camden Fire Ins. Assn.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Joslin v. National Reserve InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Clark v. Western Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. McCulloch v. Northwestern Mutual Fire Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API