Legal Opinion
Fayle v. Camden Fire Ins. Assn.
Montana Supreme Court
Decided June 17, 1929No. Nos. 6,446, 6,447PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway
These are appeals by the defendant insurance companies from judgments in favor of plaintiff. The cases were tried together in the court below and were argued here as one. This opinion will suffice for both.
Fayle, the plaintiff, owned a house in Butte which he insured against fire, one policy having been issued by the Camden Fire Insurance Association and the other by the New Yoi’k Underwriter’s’ Insurance Company. Fayle lived in the house until the middle of October, 1926, when he rented it to Shutey, his brother-in-law, who followed Fayle immediately in possession. Shutey was a miner working…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Park Saddle Horse Co. v. Royal Indemnity Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
- Nebraska & Iowa Ins. v. ChristiensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
- Montana Auto Finance Corp. v. British & Federal Fire UnderwritersMontana Supreme Court · 1924
- Sumter Tobacco Warehouse Co. v. Phoenix Assurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Royal Exch. Assur. v. ThrowerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kansas City Fire & Marine Insurance Company v. ClarkDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1963
- Terry v. National Farmers Union Life Insurance Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1960
- Patriotic Ins. Co. of America v. FranciscusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Buccola v. National Fire Ins. Co. of HartfordLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Joslin v. National Reserve InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.