Legal Opinion

Poindexter v. First National Bank of Winston-Salem

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 23, 1956No. 384PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

In passing on the question of nonsuit this Court is required to accept and interpret the evidence offered in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs. If there is conflict in the evidence, or if it is susceptible of more than one interpretation, these must be resolved in the plaintiffs’ favor. Williamson v. Clay, 243 N.C. 337, 90 S.E. 2d 727; Marshburn v. Patterson, 241 N.C. 441, 85 S.E. 2d 683; Singletary v. Nixon, 239 N.C. 634, 80 S.E. 2d 676.

Applying the recognized tests, did the plaintiffs introduce enough evidence to entitle them to have the jury pass on their claim of loss by reason…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Singletary v. NixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Marshburn v. PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Syme v. . BadgerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  4. Williamson v. ClaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Tayloe v. . TayloeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Helen C. Carras and Bill G. Carras, Co-Executors of the Estate of Gus N. Carras, Deceased v. James S. Burns, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  2. Harper v. HarperMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Fulk v. BagleyDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1980
  4. McGill v. Bison Fast Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. King Homes, Inc. v. BrysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API