Legal Opinion
Fulk v. Bagley
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided September 2, 1980No. Civ. A. No. 78-333-WSPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MERHIGE, District Judge, Sitting by Designation.
The First Amended Complaint (“the complaint”) in this cause seeks an accounting and compensatory relief from each defendant by virtue of the allegations in the complaint’s three counts. Count I arises under The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA” or “the Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. The second count is brought pursuant to the anti-fraud provision of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq. Count III is a claim for breach of fiduciary duty which arises under the common law of the State of…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Charles W. Leigh and Ervin F. Dusek, Etc., and George Johnson, Intervening v. Clyde William EngleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Braxton H. Anderson v. Ciba-Geigy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Rose v. Arkansas Valley Environmental & Utility AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1983
- Cross v. Fleet Reserve Ass'n Pension PlanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Baselski v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.