Legal Opinion

Desaman v. Butler Bros.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 19, 1911No. Nos. 17,033 — (129)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Action in the district court for St. Louis county to recover damages for personal injuries. At the trial the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $3,000. Defendant appealed from an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. After defendant had appealed, plaintiff in person and defendant’s attorneys settled the case and stipulated for a dismissal of the appeal without costs to either party, and the appeal was dismissed.

Read the full summary

Action in the district court for St. Louis county to recover damages for personal injuries. At the trial the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $3,000. Defendant appealed from an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. After defendant had appealed, plaintiff in person and defendant’s attorneys settled the case and stipulated for a dismissal of the appeal without costs to either party, and the appeal was dismissed. Thereafter upon the application of J. De La Motte, Esq., the court ordered the parties to show cause why his application…

1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.

This action was begun November 5, 1907, to recover damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff’s' attorney prosecuted tbe case under a contract witb plaintiff by tbe terms of wbicb be was to receive for bis services an amount equal to one-balf of tbe amount recovered. Tbe trial in February, 1908, resulted in a verdict for plaintiff in tbe sum of $3,000. After numerous stays, defendant’s motion for judgment or a new trial was made, and denied March 24, 1909. Defendant, on tbe same day, gave notice of appeal to this court. Tbe return on tbe appeal was made May 18, 1909. On tbe day before…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Northrup v. HaywardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. Boogren v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Farmer v. Stillwater Water Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Barnes v. VerrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  2. Desaman v. Butler Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  3. Kubu v. KabesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. In Re FunkDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1932
  5. Byram v. MinerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API