Legal Opinion

Eccleston v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1998No. NonePublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Karen Eccleston appeals an order denying her motion for costs and attorney fees and an order requiring her to pay State Farm’s costs. We affirm in part, reverse and remand in part.

FACTS

[¶2.] This case arose from a car accident involving Karen Eccleston and Brian Drexler which occurred on October 10,1992. Following the accident, Eccleston began having back and neck pain. She incurred over $7,000 in medical expenses.

[¶ 3.] Eccleston sued Drexler. State Farm, Eccleston’s underinsurance carrier, intervened and counterclaimed for its subrogation interest for medical…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Moss v. GuttormsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Meyerink v. Northwestern Public Service Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Dahn v. TrownsellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Maynard v. HeerenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Allstate Ins. Co. v. BoecherSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Schieffer v. SchiefferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Terca v. TercaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Great West Casualty Co. v. HovaldtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Stratmeyer v. EngbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API