Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 27, 2004PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This matter having come to the Court on a grant of certification, 178 N.J. 249, 837 A2d 1092 (2003), to address numerous questions raised by defendant, including whether this Court should revisit its holding in State v. Hurd, 86 N.J. 525, 432 A.2d 86 (1981), permitting hypnotically-refreshed testimony at criminal trials under standards articulated in that opinion;

And this Court having indicated previously that, since our decision in Hurd, twenty-six jurisdictions or courts in the United States have concluded that such testimony is inadmissible per se, State v. Fertig, 143 N.J. 115,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HurdSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  2. State v. DownieSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  3. State v. FertigSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  4. American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  2. State v. MooreSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  3. State v. HummelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
  4. In re the Decision on CAA 47-2007Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  5. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API