State v. Moore
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Poritz
This case returns to the Court after remand for a plenary hearing in respect of the continued viability of State v. Hurd, 86 N.J. 525, 432 A.2d 86 (1981), wherein the Court established *185guidelines for the admissibility of hypnotically refreshed testimony proffered by a witness in a criminal trial. Based on the record developed below, and the substantial body of case law that has considered the question since Hurd was decided, we have determined that a change in course is now warranted. We are no longer of the view that the Hurd guidelines can serve as an effective control for the harmful…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. HurdSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- New Jersey Department of Children & Families v. A.L.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- State v. ChenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- State v. MeansSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- State v. CulverConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.