Legal Opinion

State v. Hummel

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 13, 2018No. A–36 September Term 2016; 078476PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Timpone

**200This case is before us on the narrow issue of the legality of the police's search and seizure of the contents of defendant Lori Hummel's handbag while she was detained at the Gloucester County Prosecutor's Office. We find no valid inventory search. We therefore affirm the Appellate Division's determination that the evidence seized during the search should be suppressed. We remand to permit the defendant to withdraw her guilty plea and continue at the trial court level or, in the alternative, to proceed before a PCR court on other issues she has preserved.

I

We cull the following facts from…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Illinois v. LafayetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Bion Blake IngramSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  2. State v. FlemingOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. State v. JimNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JAMAR J. MYERS (11-08-0833 AND 14-02-0232, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
  5. State v. O.D.A.-C. (085608) (Bergen County & Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API