Legal Opinion

Kwiatek v. Buffalo Truck Sales & Service

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 26, 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying Volvo’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff cannot establish a prima facie cause of action because, by failing to comply with a prior conditional order of preclusion, plaintiff is barred from introducing any evidence regarding the central issues of liability and damages (see, Zletz v Wetanson, 67 NY2d 711, 713; Thompson v County of Erie, 91 AD2d 850, affd 61 NY2d 648; Depo v Marine Midland Bank, 79 AD2d 846, affd 54 NY2d 943; McCraith v Wehrung, 42 AD2d 825). (Appeal from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zletz v. WetansonNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. McCraith v. WehrungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  3. Depo v. Marine Midland BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Depo v. Marine Midland BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Thompson v. County of ErieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Berwecky v. Montgomery Ward, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API