Legal Opinion

Photometric Products Corp. v. Radtke

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 4, 1946No. 68, Docket 20333PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendants Radtke, Warner Brothers Pictures, Inc., and Leonard Day, are charged with conspiring with the Radtke Patents Corp. to deprive the plaintiff of its asserted rights to a patent in a complaint which set forth various grounds for relief. The plaintiff moved to substitute Robert Bruce Day as executor for Leonard Day who died more than two years before the making of the motion which was denied on the ground that under Rule 25(a) (1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, the motion would not lie. The plaintiff has appealed from the order denying its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reeves v. BeardallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Hohorst v. Hamburg-American Packet Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Hunteman v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  4. Studer v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Republic of China v. American Express Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  2. Clark v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  3. Petrol Corporation v. Petroleum Heat & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  4. United States ex rel. Weinstein v. BresslerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  5. United States v. BraunsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API