Legal Opinion

State on Inf. Murphy v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 18, 1942No. 3 Div. 376PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

This is a proceeding in the nature of quo warranto, instituted by appellant against appellee to test the latter’s right to hold office as a member of the Board of Revenue of Conecuh County.

The case was heard below on an agreed statement of facts and relief denied.

As here presented the relator makes no claim to the office himself; but challenges the right and title of respondent and seeks to oust him. As thus presented, we seek to summarize the controlling facts:

The Board of Revenue, the governing body of Conecuh County, was created by local act in 1927, Local Acts 1927, p.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Little v. FosterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  2. Birmingham Bar Ass'n v. Phillips & MarshSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  3. Clark v. State, ex rel. GravesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  4. Rainwater v. State Ex Rel. StricklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  5. State on Inf. Murphy v. BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baxter v. State Ex Rel. MetcalfSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. State ex rel. Fuller v. HargroveSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  3. In Re Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  4. State ex rel. Burkart v. SawyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API