Legal Opinion

Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Sturey

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1898No. 8089PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error, from the district court of Lancaster county. Tiled below before Tibbets, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

The plaintiff below, Mary Sturey, is the owner of lot 40, block 1, Houtz’s Place, in the city of Lincoln, which she occupies as a family homestead. In 1893 the defendant, without her knowledge or consent, constructed its railroad bed and laid its tracks over and across plaintiff’s premises and in the alley adjoining said lot, without condemning for right of way or making compensation for the loss. This suit was instituted to recover the damages sustained.' by reason of the premises, and the defendant has brought to this court for review the record of the judgment entered against it, assigning…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Carleton v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Gran v. HoustonNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Seebrock v. FedawaNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Dixon v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gledhill v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Harris v. Lincoln & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Stehr v. Mason City & Fort Dodge Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API