Legal Opinion

Carney v. Commonwealth Oil & Gas Co.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided July 31, 1933No. 400PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOPKINS, District Judge.

This is. an action in whieh the plaintiff seeks to have restored to the Prairie Oil & Gas Company its properties and assets consisting of gas producing properties and real and personal property located in this district, which, through a consolidated agreement, was transferred to and absorbed by the Sinclair Prairie Oil Company and Consolidated Oil Corporation. The plaintiff further seeks to enforce against the property the equitable claim that in equity the property still belongs to the Prairie Oil & Gas Company for the benefit of its stockholders, and to set aside the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mellen v. Moline Malleable Iron WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Westerlund v. Black Bear Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
  3. General Inv. Co. v. Lake Shore & M. S. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
  4. Commerce Trust Co. v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1924
  5. Dickinson v. Consolidated Traction Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Proctor v. the Sagamore Big Game ClubDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Hunter v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1946
  3. Robinson v. Seatex Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1944
  4. Wilhelm v. Consolidated Oil Corp.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API