Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Seatex Oil Co.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided November 11, 1944No. Civil Action No. 1164PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATWELL, District Judge.

The plaintiff is a citizen of the state of Nevada; defendant Seatex Oil Company, Inc., is a citizen of California, and defendant Red Bank Oil Company, Inc., is a citizen of Maine. By stipulation, the lack of residence of defendant Bennett and the other defendants is shown to be in Dallas County, Texas. It is also agreed that each of the corporations has its principal office and place of business in Dallas. Jurisdictional amount is involved.

The petition “is simple, concise and direct.” Rule 8, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Hart v. SansomSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. City of Dallas v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Northern Indiana Railroad Co. v. MICHIGAN CENT. RD. CO.Supreme Court of the United States · 1854
  5. Choice v. Texas Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller & Lux Incorporated v. NickelDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1957
  2. Eddington v. Texas & New Orleans R. Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1949
  3. St. Louis Royalty Co. v. Continental Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API