Fox v. Terre Haute Independent Broadcasters, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY
TINDER, District Judge.
This cause comes before the court upon defendant’s Motion to Strike. Although defendant’s motion is designated a Motion to Strike, a Motion to Strike is an inappropriate method to obtain the relief *173that the defendant requests herein. With respect to Count II, defendant is in actuality seeking a judgment on the pleadings and with respect to Count III defendant seeks to dismiss the count for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Therefore, the court will treat the Motion to Strike as a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as it relates to Count…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Naton v. Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Henry Carl DEAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Stanley ORZEL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF WAUWATOSA FIRE DEPARTMENT, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Rogers v. Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Montgomery v. CrumIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- West v. LTV Steel Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993
- Pickens v. New York Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2019