Legal Opinion

Fox v. Terre Haute Independent Broadcasters, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided December 14, 1988No. TH 86-321-CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY

TINDER, District Judge.

This cause comes before the court upon defendant’s Motion to Strike. Although defendant’s motion is designated a Motion to Strike, a Motion to Strike is an inappropriate method to obtain the relief *173that the defendant requests herein. With respect to Count II, defendant is in actuality seeking a judgment on the pleadings and with respect to Count III defendant seeks to dismiss the count for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Therefore, the court will treat the Motion to Strike as a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as it relates to Count…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Naton v. Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. Henry Carl DEAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Stanley ORZEL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF WAUWATOSA FIRE DEPARTMENT, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Rogers v. Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Montgomery v. CrumIndiana Supreme Court · 1928

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. West v. LTV Steel Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993
  2. Pickens v. New York Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API