Legal Opinion

Arthur v. Jablonow

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1984No. 45842PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANDALL, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment notwithstanding the verdict entered against plaintiff. The petition was in two counts. Count I named respondent Jablonow as defendant and sought damages for slander. Count II was a claim based on tortious interference with a business relationship against Jablonow and Mid-America Theatre Management Company. The case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff on the slander count. 1 The trial court granted defendant Jablo-now’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the “grounds that plaintiff failed to show…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. KittermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. Greening v. KlamenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Missouri Church of Scientology v. AdamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  4. Word v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Girardeau Contractors, Inc. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Delaporte v. Robey Building Supply, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Luyties Pharmacal Co. v. Frederic Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Koehr v. EmmonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Chrysler Capital Corp. v. CotlarMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Metropolitan Tickets, Inc. v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API