Legal Opinion

Koehr v. Emmons

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 24, 2001No. ED 78152PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAHAN, Presiding Judge.

Jack and Patricia Koehr, individually and as purported representatives of a class of ad valorem taxpayers, appeal the judgment in favor of the Junior College District of East Central Missouri (“District”) on their claims seeking declaratory relief and refunds of taxes allegedly levied in violation of the Hancock Amendment, Mo. Const. Art. X, Sec. 22. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

On March 11, 1998, having paid their 1997 taxes under protest, the Koehrs filed a petition against the Franklin County Collector seeking a refund of taxes allegedly levied…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Missourians for Tax Justice Education Project v. HoldenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  2. Green v. Lebanon R-III School DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  3. Ring v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  4. State Ex Rel. Byrd v. ChadwickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Arthur v. JablonowMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lane v. LensmeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  2. Craft v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Vogt v. EmmonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. State Ex Rel. Union Planters Bank, N.A. v. KendrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
  5. Frontenac Bank v. GB Investments, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API