Legal Opinion

Girardeau Contractors, Inc. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1982No. WD33239PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WASSERSTROM, Judge.

Plaintiff sues for damages under a contract by which it undertook as the prime contractor certain highway work for defendant. Trial commenced before a jury, but at the close of all the evidence the trial court sustained a motion for directed verdict, from which ruling plaintiff appeals. Defendant contends the appeal should be dismissed because plaintiff’s brief here as appellant violates Rule 84.04. That contention is denied. On the merits of the appeal, we affirm.

The work under the contract consisted of removing 7,000 feet of concrete median and *3626,500 feet of double faced…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. J. E. Hathman, Inc. v. Sigma Alpha Epsilon Club of ColumbiaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  2. Estrin Construction Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Busch & Latta Painting Corp. v. State Highway CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Commerce Trust Company v. HowardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  5. Harris v. Union Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zahorsky v. Griffin, Dysart, Taylor, Penner & Lay, P.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Wilkerson v. Mid-America CardiologyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Arthur v. JablonowMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Hasapopoulos v. MurphyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. Ikon Office Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API