Legal Opinion

Ruiz v. Crespi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 18, 1974PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, J.

The plaintiff, as buyer, entered into a contract with the defendants for the purchase of the latter’s real property. He did not take title and sued for the return of his down payment plus the net title charges. The defendants counter*45claimed for specific performance. The Special Term, after a hearing at which certain proofs were presented, denied the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granted the defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint and to direct the latter to specifically perform the terms of the contract. We reverse and grant the plaintiff’s motion and deny…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McClure v. . LeaycraftNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Margraf v. . MuirNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Hammer v. MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gerder Services, Inc. v. JohnsonNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Ilemar Corp. v. KrochmalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. McLacklan v. ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API