Gaston v. State

WIGGINTON, Judge.

In this appeal from a final judgment adjudicating appellant guilty of battery, appellant’s counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California1 in which he states that he has examined the record and researched the applicable law, and has concluded that no good faith argument can be made calling for reversal. Although afforded the opportunity by order of this Court, appellant did not file a pro se brief.

Our review of the record in this case reveals an issue as to whether the trial court properly imposed costs against appellant, payable to the Crimes Compensation Trust Fund…