Stokes v. State

In this appeal from a final judgment adjudicating appellant guilty of armed robbery and sexual battery, appellant’s counsel filed a brief, pursuant to Anders v. California,1 in which he states that he has examined the record and that in his professional judgment no reversible error appears. Appellant filed a pro se brief asserting reversible error on several grounds. We find no evidence of reversible error on the grounds raised by appellant. However, our review of the record in this case reveals an issue not raised by the Anders brief or by appellant’s pro se brief.

Appellant was adjudicated…