Legal Opinion

Davis v. Homasote Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1978No. TC 401-934, SC 24614PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is a products liability action in which plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for defendant Homasote Company. Plaintiffs claimed damages resulting from the use of 1-inch floor decking in the construction of a 48-unit apartment complex. The product was manufactured by the defendant Homasote Company, a New Jersey corporation, and was sold to Davis by Homasote’s distributor, North Pacific Lumber Company.

Plaintiffs alleged that the product was represented by defendant to be a "weather proof structural sub-floor” and "sound deadening carpet underlayment” suitable for use in the construction of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Western Seed Production Corp. v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Price v. Gatlin and Columbia Tractor & Implement Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Lee v. Meier & Frank Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Rader v. Gibbons and Reed CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Hupp Corporation v. Metered Washer ServiceOregon Supreme Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Russell v. Ford Motor Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Flory v. Silvercrest Industries, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Sloan v. Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
  4. Simonsen v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. Kalil Bottling Co. v. Burroughs Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API