Legal Opinion
Mendel v. Home Insurance
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 17, 1992No. Civ. A. 92-1217PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BARTLE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs M. Mark Mendel, Esquire (“Mendel”), Daniel E. Murray, Esquire (“Murray”), and M. Mark Mendel, Ltd. (“Mendel Ltd.”) (collectively “the insureds”), have instituted this diversity action against their professional liability insurance carrier, The Home Insurance Company (“Home”). The insureds seek to compel Home to pay on their behalf a judgment of $1,690,670 which was jointly and severally entered against them as a result of an adverse jury verdict in this Court on December 9, 1991, in the case of Silver v. Mendel, et al., Civil Action No. 86-7104…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Aetna Business Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Adler, Barish, Daniels, Levin & Creskoff v. EpsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Griggs v. BertramSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- MacFarland v. United States Fidelity & Guarantee Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Pizzini v. American International Specialty Lines InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- I.C.D. Industries, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Merchants Mutual Insurance v. ArtisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Steadfast Insurance v. Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.