Legal Opinion

United States v. Danny M. Rigsby

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 19, 1995No. 93-6594PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVELY, Circuit Judge.

The question in this case is whether the district court abused its discretion in failing to conduct an inquiry into a suggestion of possible juror bias. After a thorough examination of the record, and upon consideration of the briefs and oral arguments, we conclude that the court did not commit reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm.

I

On February 2,1992, the defendant Danny Rigsby purchased a rifle from Clarence Dean Brown at a flea market in Dallas, North Carolina. As part of the sales transaction, Rigsby filled out ATF Form 4473, which is required upon the sale of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Willie Williams, Jr. v. Margaret Bagley, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. FrostCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. Marshall Dwayne Hughes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Paul Corrado (98-2269) Nove Tocco (98-2270) Vito William Giacalone (98-2365)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. FrostCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API