Legal Opinion

United States v. Sampson

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided September 11, 2003No. CR. 01-10384-MLWPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WOLF, District Judge.

Attached, in part pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3432, is a list of potential jurors (the “venireman”) in this case and their “places of abode,” which the court has construed to mean their home addresses. See, e.g., Gregory v. United States, 369 F.2d 185, 187-88 (D.C.Cir.1966); United States v. Aiken, 76 F.Supp.2d 1339, 1344 (S.D.Fla.1999). Section 11 of this District Court’s Plan for Random Selection of Jurors (As Revised November 2000) (the “Plan”) ordinarily prohibits disclosure of the names of the venireman before they appear in response to a summons. However, where, as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Clifton Gregory v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  3. United States v. AikenDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  2. United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API