Legal Opinion

United States v. Aiken

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided October 1, 1999No. 97-233-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ DISCOVERY MOTIONS

GOLD, District Judge.

A. BACKGROUND.

Defendants, Roland David Aiken, Daniel Patrick Aiken and Ian Orville Aiken have moved to reconsider the prior discovery order 1 of the Honorable Judge Lenore C. Nesbitt entitled “Order Granting Government’s Sealed, Ex Parte, In-Camera Motion to Delay Compliance with Paragraphs ‘D’ and ‘E’ of the Standing Discovery Order” dated June 19, 1997, filed July 2, 1997. 2 This order was entered in conjunction with the original indictment filed in this cause against Donovan Sibbley and Barrington Fagan which alleged certain car…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. Herman Tyrone HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. David Ronald Chandler, A/K/A Ronnie ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. LujanDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2008
  2. United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API