Legal Opinion
United States v. Sampson
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 29, 2004No. CR. 01-10384-MLWPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WOLF, District Judge.
The court is entering the attached Judgment and Order which, pursuant to the jury’s verdicts and 18 U.S.C. §§ 3591-3597, requires that defendant Gary Sampson be executed for the carjacking resulting in the death of Philip McCloskey and the carjacking resulting in the death of Jonathan Rizzo. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3596(a), the court has designated New Hampshire as the state in which Sampson shall be executed. Therefore, Sampson shall be executed in New Hampshire in the manner prescribed by the law of New Hampshire — by lethal injection or, if that is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Sims v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Entertainment Network, Inc. v. LappinDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2001
- United States v. HammerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014