Application of Simmons Company
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board of the United States Patent Office affirming the examiner’s refusal to register appellant’s alleged trademark for mattresses on the supplemental register.
As shown by the drawing of appellant’s application, the mark comprises a series of horizontally spaced pairs of vertical rows of stitches which are applied on an outer vertical face of the mattress. The spacing between the pairs of rows of stitches is approximately six times the spacing between the rows of each pair.
As shown by the record, appellant…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Truck Equipment Service Company, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Fruehauf Corporation, Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Clairol Incorporated v. The Gillette CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Application of Deister Concentrator Company, IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
- California Cooler, Inc. v. Loretto Winery, Ltd. And Apam, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Schwinn Bicycle Co. v. Murray Ohio Manufacturing Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.