Legal Opinion

State v. Anhalt

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 19, 2001No. C2-00-2238PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PORITSKY, Judge. *

The district court determined that a no-knock search warrant executed at respondent Janet K. Anhalt’s residence was improperly issued because the warrant application lacked sufficient facts to justify an unannounced entry. The district court granted Anhalt’s motion to suppress and dismissed appellant state’s case against Anhalt, despite the fact that the officers knocked and announced before executing the warrant. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

In April 2000, South St. Paul Police Officer Sneitzer investigated “possible drug sales or usage” at respondent Janet K. Anhalt’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. State v. OthoudtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. State v. WileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State v. LienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. RothNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API