Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael Lynn Clark
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 23, 1969No. 26641_1PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:
Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of this court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See, Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I.
Appellant, Michael Lynn Clark, appeals to this court from a conviction for bail jumping under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3150 (Supp., 1969). 1 We reverse because we find that the conduct for which Clark was convicted was not an indictable offense under § 3150.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Hewitt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Emil Richard Yates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Vernon Chappell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. Hugh MacLeod Pheaster, United States of America v. Angelo IncisoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Franjo Ivic, Nedjelko Sovulj, Ivan Cale and Stipe Ivkosic, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Thomas Meacham, Joseph Ward, Edward William Gilroy, Bobby Gene Hayes and Donald L. MetsgerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- State v. JendruschHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
- United States v. Ransom F. Shoup, IICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.